The word of 2025 is Remigration. In America, Europe, and the rest of the Western world, young people recognize that our countries are facing housing crises, infrastructure crises, public unrest, and a decline in fertility, in volunteerism, and public service. It’s now generally acknowledged that these are issues related to mass migration and the resulting multicultural society in which groups compete for different political priorities under the same superficial flag.
Demography is destiny, and Western Civilization depends on the continuation of the people who created it. The demographic makeup of Western societies is changing dramatically, and against the democratic wishes of the people who live there. The United States is projected to be minority White by 2045. The Office for National Statistics predicts the UK will be minority British by 2063.
However, it’s not too late to restore a healthy demographic majority in a humane, peaceful, and even voluntary way. We are the first institution to put forward policy platforms in English to get it done.
We know Remigration done right is peaceful, humane, and even in-line with the general wishes of all ethnic groups.
- 45% of people of color wish to depart the United States
- ·26% of Asians would like to relocate to their ethnic homelands
- In the UK, 66% of non-British people aged 16-34 are considering or actively planning to leave the UK
We are the first institution to put forward policy platforms in English to get it done. Since we receive a number of questions on the topic, we hope this can be a shared resource. If there are questions we haven’t answered here, please make suggestions in the comments below!
Q: What is the Great Repatriation/Remigration?
We define remigration as: the necessary, orderly, and safe deportation and repatriation of non-Western peoples back to their countries of ancestral origin or a third country willing to take them.
Q: Why Is remigration necessary?
We believe the model of ethnically and culturally cohesive nation-states is necessary for human freedom, prosperity, and flourishing.
Over the past 60 years Western countries have been subject to levels of mass immigration that have led to unprecedented and destabilizing demographic change. These demographic changes were brought about without the democratic consent of Western people(s) and have resulted in remarkable social, cultural, and economic upheaval.
To give an example, in the year 1991 the United Kingdom was 93% British. As of 2022 the United Kingdom is just 76.8% British. The Office for National Statistics predicts the UK will be minority British by 2063.
Remigration is necessary to ensure that the native British and other Western peoples remain a majority in our homelands.
Q: Is This a Right-Wing Idea?
No! While it is certainly true most nationalist parties are of a right-of-center outlook there are some left-wing parties and governments that have engaged in immigration restriction and remigration.
The Social Democratic government of Denmark has taken many actions to both curtail immigration and ensure that the non-Western population of any municipality does not exceed 30%. Thereby forcing the integration of immigrants.
Remigration is one of the few truly bi-partisan issues.
Demographics and Denmark: An Immigration Model to Replicate?
Q: Who exactly do you want to deport and repatriate?
We propose that Western nations establish two programs:
1. A ‘mandatory remigration’ program that focuses on deporting: non-citizen immigrants, foreign-born criminals, dual-citizen criminals, citizenship fraudsters, and;
2. A ‘voluntary remigration’ program that: establishes programs of voluntary repatriation for the tens of millions of non-Western people who are citizens of Western states yet have expressed a desire to leave the West.
Q: What is “Voluntary Remigration?”
Voluntary remigration is a policy of facilitating the return of the descendants of recent immigrants to their ancestral homelands or a third country willing to take them. We propose Western governments establish programs to financially and logistically enable the repatriation of those who wish to go. This would involve significant payments to help repatriates establish new lives abroad as well as administrative help to allow them to acquire the necessary permits, visas, and foreign passports. Despite generous payments to enable the voluntary relocation of recent immigrants, these programs are economically a savings to the native population as our current immigrant population is unsustainable. Read more on Remigration & The Economy here.
Q5: Do people REALLY want to leave, though?
Yes! Across the West recent immigrants and refugees desire to return home. 30% of Syrian refugees have expressed an intent to return to their homeland. In another example the Foundation for European Progressive Studies found that 24% of Turkish people in Germany want to return or move to Turkey.
Surveys conducted in the United Kingdom have shown that 66% of non-Britons between the age of 16 and 34 are considering or currently planning leave the United Kingdom.
Those Who Want to Go: A Voluntary Repatriation from Britain
In the United States a 2024 poll by Monmouth University revealed that 45% of People of Color (POCs) in the United States would move abroad if they were free to do so. Another poll shows that some 26% of Asians in the United States want to leave the country.
Those Who Want to Go: A More Expansive Great Repatriation
A Harris Poll from February of 2025 revealed that 61% of Hispanics and 57% of African Americans in the United States have considered leaving the country, along with 52% of Democrats and 61% of LGBT-plus individuals.
Q: Are any foreign countries open to taking people back?
Absolutely! Numerous countries in the Middle East, South America, and Africa have expressed a willingness and desire to see their diaspora return home from the West.
El Salvador’s Nayib Bukele claims that 62% of Salvadorans in the United States wish to return to their homeland. The El Salvadoran president has even pushed through legislation to make it easier for Salvadorans to return home, move their possessions, and open businesses.
The Vision of Salvadoran Remigration
A number of African countries have also issued the call for the global African diaspora to return home. Nations such as Ghana, Sierra Leone, Uganda and Senegal have either established programs or expressed an interest in establishing programs to welcome the expansive African diaspora to the continent. Other individuals, such as former African Union ambassador to the United States Dr. Arikana Chihombori-Quao, are working in the private and NGO sector to inspire the diaspora to relocate to Africa.
In another, but far from final, example a Belgian-born Moroccan parliamentarian is shepherding legislation through the Moroccan parliament expressly designed to welcome the Moroccan diaspora home to live, work, and invest in their homeland.
The Vision of Moroccan Repatriation
Q: Can you even move this many people?
Unquestionably! Western and other governments not to mention the private sector of the modern era are some of the most well-resourced and efficient institutions to ever exist.
If the United States were to deport every illegal immigrant over its land border it would increase border traffic by a mere 0.67%, and that is assuming they were all deported in a single year. If the US were to deport every illegal alien by way of airplane, US air traffic would increase by 2.45% for the year.
Heathrow in the United Kingdom handles more than 80 million passengers per annum, were the United Kingdom to deport its entire population of 1.6 million foreign-heritage criminals it would represent a 1.75% increase in air passenger traffic for the year.
The Logistics of the Great Repatriation – Updated!
Q: Can Western governments afford the expense?
Western governments cannot afford not to engage in remigration! Without remigration the non-Western population’s significant burden upon our welfare states and public services will lead to higher deficits, higher government debt, and the eventual collapse of these services.
For example, The Federation for American Immigration Reform found that immigrant retirees receive up to 120% of what they paid into the Social Security System, leaving a deficit. Meanwhile native-born Americans receive only 96% of their contributions to the system thereby leaving a surplus for future generations.
Likewise, immigrants place such a burden on Sweden’s state pension system that demands upon its treasury are expected to double and possibly collapse the pension system entirely. Immigrants also receive 58% of all social welfare payments in the Nordic country, contributing significantly to ever higher taxation upon the native Swedish populace.
These welfare outlays and pension payments will last for lifetimes and decades, representing a perpetual drag on Western taxpayers. Remigration programs have a definitive start and end. In this way, they stand to save the Western world hundreds of billions, if not trillions, in outlays.
Q: What about people who don’t want to leave?
Many immigrants have integrated into the West and so any citizen of a Western country, regardless of background, who is law abiding and received their citizenship legitimately (did not commit fraud) is welcome to choose to stay in the West. We do not propose the arbitrary denaturalization of entire groups of people as this would be destabilizing – the process must be deliberate and structured.
Additionally, there are politicians and personalities such as half-British Ben Habib and Anglo-Indian Suella Braverman, who have expressed concerns about demographic change in the West. This shows that very limited numbers of immigrants are able to make our national concerns their own and in that way integrate. We would welcome working with individuals like this to stop the Great Replacement.
Q: Do these ideas have any public support in the West?
Absolutely! Polling by IFOP shows that 61% of the French are aware of the Great Replacement, 69% of the French feel there are too many immigrants in their country, and 62% of the French do not feel safe in their homeland. Additionally, 44% of the French believe that the children of immigrants cannot become French, up from just 25% who held this belief in 2016.
A 2019 survey of native Britons found that 68.5% of the British feel negatively about the fact that native Britons will be a minority by 2060. A 2023 survey by the Oxford Migration Observatory shows that 52% of Britons want migration decreased while only 14% want to see an increase. More Britons feel immigration is a bad thing at 33% than feel it is a good thing at 31%.
A recent CNN poll found that 35% of White Americans and 33% of all Americans believe that diversity is a threat to American culture – a three-fold increase from the 2019 polling. This figure rises to 43% among non-college educated Whites and 39% among all non-college educated Americans. Other polling from 2024 shows that 55% of Americans want a significant decrease in all immigration, the highest figure since 2001. A 2024 Ipsos poll found that 54% of Americans support the mass deportation of illegal immigrants while 69% of Americans favor limiting the ability of migrants to claim asylum.
In the Netherlands polling conducted in early 2025 showed that 52% of the Dutch are worried they will become a minority in their own country while 47% said that parts of the country no longer feel like the Netherlands. A further 60% of the Dutch said that Islam does not fit in with Dutch society. This is significant as a huge share of immigrants to the Netherlands come from the Islamic world.
These ideas not only have a significant share of public backing but have increasing sympathy with more and more Western publics.
Q: Do these ideas have any government support in the West?
Certainly! The Swedish government is currently in the process of putting together a voluntary repatriation program that would pay recent immigrants legally resident in Sweden up to $34,000 to return to their countries of origin.
The country is also preparing to revoke record numbers of residence permits, tighten immigration laws, and just recently the Swedish state announced that it would be changing its constitution to revoke the citizenship of people who threaten the country including anyone who obtained their citizenship by fraud.
Sweden Continues Pioneering Repatriation—Are They Reading White Papers?
Q: Would you support these ideas for non-Western countries?
We believe in the principles of sovereignty and autonomy for all peoples in their native lands. So, yes! We absolutely support non-Western countries that may want to engage in safe and humanitarian repatriation programs in pursuit of safety and prosperity.
White Papers has published guest posts by Africans, Indians, and others welcoming their views on immigration, remigration, and nationalism.