It should surprise no nationalist, right winger, or even normal American or European that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is institutionally anti-White, Anti-West, and anti-family.

NATO is among the vast array of post-1945 institutions that force ever increasing liberalism on its member states, even going so far as to threaten those states that have expressly rejected the more radical elements of this liberalism and its consequences.

The liberalizing and anti-family trends within these institutions are best demonstrated by the 2023 rulings of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) which is attempting to force both Romania and Ukraine to legalize same-sex marriage. But, the ECHR is actually behind the times in this regard. It was NATO that first took up the torch of giving institutional preference to the non-traditional family, a matter which we shall explore in greater detail below.

All links provided are to official NATO reports, press releases and statements.

NATO is, rather unsurprisingly, institutionally anti-White and dedicated to ‘diversity and inclusion’ for ethnic and cultural strangers in Western societies. NATO looks to radically diversify its staff and in doing so is exposing Western countries and their populations to greater danger. Countries such as the United States, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand have already suffered greatly due to their own policies of allowing first and second generation immigrants into their militaries, intelligence agencies, and legislatures, thereby exposing state secrets to countries and adversaries such as China and Mexico.

Despite the institutions and dogmas of liberalism exposing the West to this undermining influence NATO has, as far back as 1999, made it its mission to go about penning reports blaming many modern ills upon nationalists and warning against nationalist influence in the West.

More recently, in 2023, NATO held a high level staff conference (below) about race where leaders pledged to fight a “homogeneous mindset” and to use “collective intelligence” to do so.

This seems to suggest that NATO seeks to undermine any ethnic, cultural, or common cohesive feeling among the institutions in its member states and increase yet more countries to the dogmas of diversity and its consequences.

NATO is so dedicated to concepts of diversity and inclusion that it even goes so far as to say inclusion and participation are not enough. Institutions must be reshaped to be “inclusive”, meaning they must be reconstructed to be more culturally liberal and contain more cultural and ethnic foreigners with no established ties to the Western societies and countries that NATO is supposedly responsible for protecting.

The leadership of NATO are strongly dedicated to pushing the modern brand of feminism feminism, meaning they are dedicated, like so many national governments, to sending women and girls onto the battlefield where they are unable to perform, destroy unit cohesion ,and the brotherhood that an armed force is supposed to inculcate into its troops.

Many, many, reports have been issued on how societies must not only tolerate LGBTQ etc. groups and movements, but must embrace them and offer them “A strong dignity” and privileged place within Western societies. NATO not only demands this change but it seeks to lead and has led the way for some time on this particular issue.

As early as 2002, at a time when only one NATO member state had legalized gay marriage (The Netherlands), NATO extended full benefits to all same-sex couples under its employ, thus equating those relationships with traditional marriage.

the national associations which support NATO, and receive support from NATO and which are often run by ex-NATO employees, have even gone so far as to demand that NATO punish member states which do not uphold liberal interpretations of homosexual and transgender rights. In essence, legalize gay marriage or NATO will take punitive measures against you.

The alliance’s dedication to diversity and inclusion, liberal social change, and penchant for social experimentation takes up tens of millions of dollars in NATO funding each year. NATO dedicates large numbers of staff and time to promoting these ideas and does so under the guise that it is essential to the functioning and potential survival of the alliance.

Through integrating this ideological mix into its very structure, such as by having official Gender Advisors to senior NATO staff, NATO ensures that all member state militaries are exposed to these various ideological commitments. No NATO member-state is truly able to ignore or avoid this reality.

NATO is anti-Western, anti-family and anti-woman.