The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is a state comprised of ancient nations that have projected their rich cultural histories worldwide. Whether by empire or media export, British culture dominates the manners, dress, speech and lifestyle in the modern globalized world. Unfortunately, though, Britain is itself being subsumed by waves of immigrants, by a neoliberal economic order, and by an elite which cares nothing for the native Britons who are responsible for this very cultural inheritance.

As always with our Great Repatriation pieces, we believe that by exposing the efficacy and relative ease with which the demographic decline of a nation can be reversed we will enable others to make the political case with much more ease. For Britain solutions to the demographic replacement of its native British population abound and could be carried out with minimal expense and maximum benefit to the British nation.

We will also, as ever, propose the majority of our solutions within the current framework of British law, refraining from putting forward ideas that would require sweeping legislative packages or core institutional reform. Though we do understand that these styles of reforms are very necessary in the medium to long term.

80% of Britain’s foreign-born population arrived in the country in the post-1991 era, and a staggering 42% of the foreign-born population has arrived since the year 2011 alone. Just this post-2011 immigrant population represents some 2.5 million people. This entire demographic represents roughly 10 million foreigners, some 5.5 million of whom are of non-British extraction.

The 2021 census showed that 59.6 million live in England and Wales, of which roughly 10.9 million people are part of the non-Western ethnic minority population. This means that a full 50% of the UK’s non-Western population is of foreign-born origin and therefore possesses the most minimal of connections to Britain.

It is also worth mentioning that non-EU migrants (almost all of whom are non-Western) are generally not in the UK for “work” or to “support the British economy”. A full 60% of these immigrants are in the UK for familial or ‘other’ reasons, meaning that Britain is a destination of chain migration. Only 23% of Britain’s non-Western migrants are in the country for work purposes.

The first and most sensible step is to stop the issuance and renewal of residency visas, work visas, study visas and any other variety of visa. The British government was able to suspend visa issuance in 2020 by closing all of its biometric processing centres both domestically and abroad, an elegant policy which should be reinstated by a pro-British government in the future. Further, all refugees, criminals and those “liable for deportation” could also have their indefinite leave (ILR) to remain revoked by the Home Office. This population of non-citizen non-Brits who would have their visas cancelled and ILR statuses revoked would number some 2.5 million people, roughly 400,000 of whom would be children under the age of 18.

A further 2 million children in the UK are children of parents whom were both born abroad. Roughly 1 million of these children have two non-Western foreign-born parents, and therefore would, according to our stance against family separation, be required to leave the country with their parents. Not all of these children would necessarily leave in this first step, as many will have a parent or parents who have become UK citizens.

The second step is to use the broad power of the United Kingdom’s Home Secretary to begin revoking the citizenship of all those who have defrauded, abused, or otherwise misused the British immigration system to settle in the country.

We have already covered this subject in a policy paper on the Patriotic Alternative website, and so we shall be taking from our previous work:

An analysis has shown over 50% of Asians and 40% of Africans in the United Kingdom are liable for or already possess dual nationality. Is it just politically impossible for the British State to revoke citizenship once it is conferred? It turns out that laws are already on the books that, in some circumstances, provide extensive powers for the State to undo what has been done: in cases of dual citizenship, legislation exists which currently enables the Home Secretary to denaturalise any dual national of the UK, or person able to attain another nationality – determining that an individual is legally subject to denaturalisation is achieved by applying one or more of three criteria: a) should it be considered that doing so is conducive to the public good; b) if the person obtained their citizenship through fraud, false representation or concealment; or c) if the persons have conducted himself or herself in a manner which is, quote: “seriously prejudicial to the vital interests of the United Kingdom”.

These existing powers could be utilized to begin the process of de-naturalising and deporting some of the over 1.6 million people in the ethnic minority population who possess a criminal record.

Other grounds for the revocation of citizenship, such as fraud, also need to be utilized by a pro-British government of the future. A House of Commons Report from 2013 estimates that as many as 10,000 sham marriages take place in the UK a year which enables fraudsters to obtain British nationality. This would mean that since 1991 more than 320,000 people have unlawfully obtained British citizenship through just this method of fraud.

Other popular methods of fraudulent immigration and citizenship acquisition include “fake families” scams and even scams where men are paud to falsely claim a pregnant woman is carrying their child.

Birth certificates can be examined, the state of marriages or relationships can be checked by the Home Office, cohabitation arrangements (or lack thereof) can be investigated. Many of these fraudsters may never be caught, but many also can be and should be.

So it can be seen that there exists within the British system, ample law and precedent to, in the case of nearly 5 million or more persons of either temporary residency, or of whom the State can reasonably deem their ‘citizenship in good standing’ is questionable, either revoke citizenship or residency permit.

Some interesting results of the policies proposed herein would be the increase of the Western share of the school-age population of Britain from 73.5% to 86.1% (a 12.6% increase). While the share of the native British school-age demographic would increase from the current 66.3% to 77.7% (or an 11.4% increase).

Housing prices would drop, as an abundance of units flooded the market while emergency services would be far less strained and a tighter labour market would lead to increasing wages for native Britons.