One of the realities of being an American nationalist is that this country has always had mixed demography. Without question the United States was created and formed around the culture of the European settlers who built and maintained this nation, but African Americans and Hispanic Americans (in some states) have also always been present as the Union expanded. Similarly, Hawaii entered the Union with Asian settlers who had been there since the 1880s. Some Chinese-in-Hawaii claim seventh generation status and many Japanese-in-Hawaii are the descendants of fifth and sixth generation status.

My point? Even after any policy of repatriation America will still be a country with several ethnic and racial groups. White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, and American Indians will continue to live together in this country, the most significant difference will be that those who want to leave will have been given the opportunity to do so while those who have come illegally or in violation of American expectations of proper conduct (immediately making use of our welfare state, for example) will have been made to depart.

If the projections in the American Repatriation Policy Platform by Mike Adams are remotely correct a post-repatriation America would still have a population of around 250 – 255 million people with:

• 202 million White Americans
• 25 million Hispanic Americans
• 3.5 – 5 million Asian Americans
• 18 – 20 million African Americans
• And 3 – 4 million American Indian

This vision of America accurately reflects the demographic mix America had for more than 350 years between 1607 and the 1970s. It restores the Western demographic core around which the United States and its unique institutions were constructed, and which other groups were expected to integrate into culturally.

Still, there are two important questions to answer:

Can we build a coalition of voters and people to bring this America about?

And what vision of a common post-repatriation should American nationalists offer?

The first question is simpler than it seems. This coalition of Americans is already beginning to form. Recent data from a Democratic pollster reflects what we have known for months now; young men are becoming significantly more right-wing.

This includes a majority of under-20-year-old White and minority men. In fact, young men are more right-wing than their 75-year-old grandfathers, this holds across races and demographics.

These developments are not especially surprising. 28% of Hispanics, or about 18 million Americans, are of third-generation extraction. 65% of these Americans have at least one non-Hispanic ancestor, 56% identify as primarily American (significantly higher than even second-generation Hispanics), and 75% are English dominant – second generation Hispanics are only 43% English dominant. Of third-generation Hispanics who are married 65% have a non-Hispanic spouse, and they are overwhelmingly marrying into established White/Ethnic American families. These trends of integration provide a great deal of context for the swing in sentiments among young Hispanic men and their greater political (and sometimes genetic) closeness to young White men than to their immigrant grandparents and in some cases parents.

In short, these young men are the core of the 55% of legally resident Hispanics who don’t want to voluntarily repatriate.

These Hispanic Americans also have every reason to view the 14 million illegal immigrants, the 50% of legal immigrants on welfare, DACA recipients, and the children of illegal aliens as a burden on the United States in the same way that a 20-something White American male does. And the voting data obviously reflects this. Beyond the voter data, polling has shown 53% of Hispanic Americans support the mass deportation of illegal aliens, an Axios poll showed 45% of Hispanic Americans support such deportations.

Once again, I can hear the reader asking: what is my point? My point is that young Hispanic Men and Young White men share policy priorities around mass immigration and the danger it poses to American identity and prosperity. There is every reason to form a deportation-coalition with these two groups of young men at its core. If we can build a consensus around deporting illegal immigrants, the children of illegals, people who harbor illegal aliens, and to denaturalize people abusing the welfare state we can deport as many as 50 million people from this country. This would reverse 25 years’ worth of demographic change and welfare state growth.

The even better news is that this coalition is already starting to come into being. Donald Trump won a majority of young White men and young Hispanic men. The president also reiterated in his recent interview on the Ingraham Angle that:

“Well I am a nationalist, but I am a nationalist of the United States – not for anybody else”

His vision this term has started off well, but Trump’s America is not going to prove enough to bring these disparate American patriots together. At least not in the long term. We need to think bigger and in order to do that we need to look to examples of successful nationalist leaders in our modern era. I am namely thinking of President Nayib Bukele of El Salvador.

As with the United States prior to the 1970s El Salvador has a core foundational population. In El Salvador’s case this is the Catholic Mestizo people and around their core cultural pillar are minorities of Whites, Blacks, and Indigenous peoples. And like the United States today El Salvador was experiencing record levels of violence, illicit drug crime, and social decay. Businesses were shuttering, women were not safe on the streets, gangs ruled entire neighborhoods, and cartels operated with impunity.

This is eerily reminiscent of TDA occupations of apartment buildings, America’s numerous drug crisis, the businesses closing in our city centers and much more. Unlike America, though El Salvador turned its fortunes around is the safest country in the Western hemisphere and has now set its sights on an economic boom that will propel the country into prosperity.

In contrast crime in the United States is out of control and the economy, while growing, is sluggish compared to neighboring states. In building a coalition we will need a vision for the common future of the United States and I think that we get a glimpse of it in Bukelism.

Build and Build:

Bukele has made it his mission to pour capital into the country’s infrastructure. New Airports, new rail networks, roundabouts, roads, bridges, and major port expansions are fueling an income boom in the country. Much of this investment is being made in concert with private industry and has fueled other private sector booms.

The United States, with an infrastructure grade of C- from the American Society of Civil Engineers, desperately needs this kind of investment in its infrastructure. American airports are aging rapidly, air traffic control infrastructure is unsustainably outdated, all the while the number of levees and bridges in need of reconstruction or repair numbers in the tens of thousands. Yet, in the current liberal, diversity obsessed, and in many cases decidedly anti-White political climate these things have become nearly impossible to achieve without significant effort on the part of dueling politicians. America needs consensus and it may just have that in a post-repatriation era.

Safe Streets are Busy Streets:

The crime crackdown that has made El Salvador the safest country in the Western hemisphere has led to a boom in the number of small and medium businesses. According to a recent reports conducted by private corporations and the El Salvador Social Security Institute the number of neighborhood based businesses has increased by 25% since 2018 and in some communities like Apopa have seen a staggering 227% increase in these local enterprises. Meanwhile in the United States the downtowns of our major cities are half as active as they were before the pandemic, much of this has been fueled by the soaring levels of crime and petty theft.

By getting serious about crime America can get serious about reviving Main Street, walkable downtowns, and public spaces for all to enjoy. It would suddenly become worth while to build new public squares and amenities, like El Salvador has done, rather than pouring money into downtowns that simply cannot be revived in the current social and political climate or isolated suburbs that do not support public life.

Bringing Down Food Prices:

A combination of government policies has resulted in inflation not only easing but beginning to reverse. In November of 2024 the rate of inflation in the nation was -0.31% compared to November of 2023! Most of this decrease in prices was driven by a -0.7% deflation of food prices in the country. In order to easy prices and inevitably bring about this modest deflation the government invested heavily in local market spaces, wholesale distribution and pricing for vendors, and has even worked with the private sector to launch domestic food systems that remove the country’s reliance on imported foods. Recently the government and private sector launched the nation’s first nationwide dairy brand: Lácteos de El Salvador.

By decentralizing the food system and removing control from just a few corporations (a situation the United States still finds itself in) El Salvador has managed to bring prices down in the most crucial sector for any household or society. Wholesale hubs and Agro markets have been so successful that the deflation has continued in the country. These agrohubs and the distribution center established with government support (but operated by private local vendors) provide foodstuffs at 50% the price of large companies and international firms.

All of these economic and safety developments are tied with a society that has firmly rejected the ideological failure that is postwar liberalism and neoliberal thought. El Salvador has not sought to relitigate abortion or LGBT issues, both of which are viewed as secondary and luxurious liberal concerns. The country has instead focused on core services, safety, and pricing. It’s amazing what a nation can achieve when it jettisons the mass scaffolding of liberalism and embraces developmental priorities above NGO and DEI concerns.

America can build a much more cohesive, patriotic, and civil society if we can build the coalition of Americans necessary to undue so much of the damage that immigration, multiculturalism, liberalism, and globalism have caused us. It is the project of the century and a coalition force could swiftly bring it about.